Whether we love or hate season 3 is a subjective topic but there is an objective topic that concerns Sarah’s driving motivations during this season; this topic must be addressed because it gives rise to two polar views of Sarah, depending on how we answer the three questions below:
- Why doesn’t Sarah get back with Chuck after 3.02 Three Words?
- Why does Sarah turn to Shaw?
- Why is Sarah mad at Chuck after his red test?
The First Sarah
This is perhaps the common interpretation of season 3 and it also seems to find support in some comments by Schwedak themselves when they were trying to put out the firestorm after 3.07 Mask. There are three problems with this view: it makes no sense, it turns Sarah into an irrational idiot, and it doesn’t match what we seen on the screen. Let’s see why.
Why doesn’t Sarah get back with Chuck after Three Words? She doesn’t get back with Chuck after hearing his heartfelt confession of love at the end of Three Words because (a) she made herself vulnerable in Prague and got burned, so she’s hesitant to make herself vulnerable again and (b) because he’s changing and becoming a typical spy and she doesn’t want to end up like Karl with Carina. In other words, she does it for her sake. But this makes no sense because (a) she does make herself emotionally available again with Shaw, a virtual stranger, and because (b) her solution is to hook up with another typical spy (Shaw) with whom she does end up like Karl with Carina in 3.13 Other Guy. And not just once but twice. Well, maybe she doesn’t want to make herself vulnerable again with Chuck. But this also makes no sense because (a) he chose to be a spy for noble reasons and she knows it and is moved by it, because (b) it’s the same choice she made in the first two seasons (they are walking in each other’s shoes), and because (c) Shaw makes what to her appears to be the very same choice in 3.12 American Hero when he chooses the spy life (death) over being with her and still gets a kiss from Sarah and her commitment to him (as she says to Chuck at the beginning of his love declaration).
Why does Sarah turn to Shaw? She turns to Shaw because (a) she needs the emotional comfort due to Chuck becoming a spy, because (b) Shaw’s emotionally safe since she doesn’t have feelings for him and thus she will not end up like Karl with Carina, and (c) Shaw’s her type and saved her life and doesn’t need her protection and is a super spy like her. But this makes no sense because (a) she’s seeking comfort from the very person who’s the catalyst of the changes she hates in Chuck,1One might reply that Shaw is merely doing his job. But this doesn’t work because one could simply retort that so is Chuck. because (b) with Shaw she does end up like Karl with Carina, and because (c) Shaw was the one who accidentally poisoned her in the first place, only saved her life because Chuck saved both their lives, and Chuck saved Shaw’s life twice, so Chuck doesn’t need their protection either but they are the ones who need Chuck’s protection.
Why is Sarah mad at Chuck after his red test? She is mad at Chuck after his red test because he killed a man even though he didn’t like guns. But this makes no sense because she’s killed many people and is leaving with the very man who ordered Chuck’s red test and who’s also killed many people.
Ultimately, this popular view of season-3 Sarah makes her the ultimate idiot who pulls back from Chuck for her sake because she doesn’t want to end up like Karl with Carina, so she decides instead to hook up with a man she doesn’t know or love over the man she knows and loves—and not just any man she doesn’t love but the very man who’s mentoring the man she loves into becoming like the man she doesn’t love—only to end up exactly like Karl with Carina and it’s the man she knows and loves but whom she rejected who ends up saving her from the man she doesn’t know or love but whom she chose. She sacrifices love for safety due to self-preservation and almost pays with her life for it and is only saved by the love she rejected for safety. Morpheus was right—fate, it seems, is not without a sense of irony.
The Second Sarah
This view is almost as popular and has three advantages over the first view:
- It’s supported by what we see on screen;
- It’s rational;
- It makes Sarah supremely loving and likable rather than a hypocritical idiot.
Let’s see why.
Why doesn’t Sarah get back with Chuck after Three Words? She doesn’t get back with Chuck after Three Words because of (a) duty and (b) selfless love. 3.02 Three Words is the reversal of 2.03 Break-Up. The same way that Chuck selflessly pulled back from Sarah in Break-Up because crazy-in-love Sarah was going to get herself killed and hesitated and couldn’t properly do her job, Sarah pulls back from Chuck in Three Words because (a) Beckman tasked her with training Chuck to become a spy and (b) the emotional Swiss cheese that is Chuck in Three Words won’t last five minutes in the spy world, so Sarah selflessly pulls back from him in tears after watching Carina’s video because she wants him to succeed as a spy and have a career that will give his life meaning and purpose. In other words, she does it for his sake.
She also can’t be with Chuck because he is the one who pulls back from her after Carina’s live demo with Karl in Three Words makes him realize that he needs to bury his feelings for Sarah if he’s to become a successful spy for the greater good. Chuck and Sarah are walking in each other’s shoes in season 3 compared to the first two seasons. Chuck is now the one who denies his feelings for Sarah in order to become a spy while Sarah is the one who wants a real relationship. She’s the one giving him all the longing looks while he’s moved on. We can see it because he immediately stops pursuing her after Carina’s courtyard demo with Karl until Morgan makes him realize in 3.09 Beard that he still loves Sarah and it’s foolish to deny it.
Why does Sarah turn to Shaw? Sarah turns to Shaw because Chuck has moved on, is losing himself in the spy life, and has replaced her with Hannah, leaving Sarah a work of real-life redemption in progress. Just like S1-2 Chuck, she desperately wants a real relationship and starts one with Shaw only when he lets her hope she can have one (Shaw in 3.08 Fake Name, “If this is you, I like you. I want more” and at the end of the episodes when he calls her by her real name). In other words, Sarah is now acting on Chuck’s request from 1.04 Wookiee to reveal her real name because she now craves real, the same way Chuck did in the first two seasons. When she later realizes during the Final Exam stakeout that Shaw is not interested in a real relationship but only in a spy relationship, she admits to Chuck that her relationship with Shaw is different (not real) and she’s ready to be with Chuck as soon as he asks her back.
Why is Sarah mad at Chuck after his red test? She is mad at Chuck after his red test because her reaction is the reversal of Chuck’s reaction in 2.12 Third Dimension. The same way Chuck was mad at her for executing a man in cold blood and demanded an explanation, she’s mad at him for allegedly executing a man in cold blood and demands an explanation. Chuck and Sarah are walking in each other’s shoes. The same way she gave him an evasive answer he had to accept on faith, he gives her an evasive answer she has to accept on faith. Ultimately, season-3 Sarah has to accept Chuck as he is, the real Chuck, fallen from the soteriological pedestal she put him on in the first two seasons. Once she does that (in the packing scene), her faith is rewarded by Casey with the revelation that Chuck is not only not fallen, but is indeed supremely loving and selfless to the point of self-sacrifice and is indeed her ideal man.
The shock (above) and the anger (below). Walking in each other’s shoes.
This second view makes Sarah rational and loving. It makes Sarah pull back from Chuck for his sake, so that he can succeed in his chosen profession even though she has to sacrifice her heart’s desire in the process. Everything that she does is because of her selfless love for Chuck, because of her sense of duty, and because of her quest for a real life.
Season 3 is a reversal of the first two seasons, not just thematically at the big-picture level or in Chuck and Sarah’s role reversal, but down to the individual episodes and scenes, which are reversals of previous episodes and scenes.
“Sarah desperately wants a real relationship and starts one with Shaw only when he lets her hope she can have one.”
I don’t think people are buying it. I think they would have if Shaw was written as a nice guy. But as you know, he was a disgusting human being, so they rejected it. I mean, how do they recover from Shaw sexually harassing Sarah? Add in Shaw trying to blowup castle with Chuck still in it and you have a disaster. Shaw is a good spy! right? Worst, Sarah doesn’t seem to notice what games Shaw is playing and keeps overlooking Shaw’s obvious character flaws. Hence you get the fan reaction to the writers. They assassinated Sarah’s character.
The creators and Yvonne said they were trying to give Sarah a choice between Chuck and Shaw. They FAILED. Shaw was unworthy of Sarah. Knowing that the audience rejected the story line. They kept pushing Shaw as a viable option. The ratings crashed. They almost lost the show.
I would love to buy into the Second Sarah. But I can’t; I would have to respect Shaw and that is never going to happen. Trade a caring Cole for Shaw and you can see a viable choice emerges. If Brice was still alive that would have hit the ball out of the park because he had the charisma to win out over Chuck.
I choose to believe Sarah and Shaw were just having spy sex without emotional attachments to get over their pain. That lets me move past this sad story arc.
Oh, I can totally understand the fans’ reaction to Shaw as a disgusting character since it’s the the same reaction I had the first time I watched the show. I just think we are not supposed to see him that way. I think Fedak genuinely wants us (and the main characters) to see him as a great spy, a more real version of Cole.
The tell for me has always been in the way Sarah kisses. When she is being passionate she places her hands on her partner’s face. When Sarah kisses Shaw, her hands are always on his face. When she kisses Chuck after his declaration of love for her, after Chuck saves Shaw, her hands were nowhere to be seen. This caused two very different thoughts. Was she just going along with the kiss and still committed to Shaw and DC or was she thrown off by Chuck’s admission and couldn’t decide how to express her feelings. When you get to the next episode and she tells Chuck yes to his Do you love me, her hands are on Chuck’s face when they kiss. To me the kisses alluded to some passion on Sarah’s part for Shaw.
How can Sarah be committed to Shaw when he just chose a suicide mission for another woman and told Sarah so to her face and even belittled her pleas as sentimental nonsense? how can she be committed Washington when her reaction to Washington on several occasions is always unhappy?
A few viewers are thrown off by Sarah’s two different kisses in American Hero and think Shaw “got the better kiss,” but I think we should look at Shaw and Sarah’s kiss as a tender goodbye kiss and at Chuck and Sarah’s kiss as a reversal of the Prague kiss.
Realistically, there is no reason for Sarah to be committed to Washington, let alone to Shaw, after Chuck’s love declaration.
As always you provide insight that most of us do not see. I was one of the few viewers. I’m new to the series and was taken aback by what happened in season 3 until I found your site which has helped to put many things in perspective. The acting by Yvonne Strahovski through this journey was outstanding. Do actors get this amount of detail when they develop their characters?
Trust me, you are not the only one who was taken aback by season 3. I’m not sure of the details the actors get, but there are interviews with the cast on YouTube where the actors say they knew the charters intimately and knew what the characters would or would not do. I think the development of the characters is a back-and-forth between the actors and the creative team.
I respectfully disagree that Sarah is making herself emotionally available to Shaw. I see her turning to him for comfort because she’s lonely and she misses Chuck. After all, she only goes to Shaw’s apartment after she looks at Chuck’s dinner date with Hannah. She also doesn’t have to feel anything real and she won’t get hurt again. Shaw tells her he’s the safest guy in the world. Why would he say that if it’s not the way we’re supposed to see it? I just don’t see her backing off for Chuck’s sake, the way he did for her in S2.
Maybe she thinks she can have “real” with Shaw, but she’s lying to herself, the same way Chuck is with Hannah.
That’s my simple version, and the way it looks obvious to me.
Hi Wayne,
Thank you for your thoughtful comment. I agree that she misses Chuck, but I also think it’s a bit more than that. She missed Chuck in the two Cole episodes (she said so to Chuck at the end of 2.15 Beefcake), and she had Cole pursuing her hard then, yet she didn’t give in to the temptation.
I think what we are supposed to see in season 3, which appears to be confirmed by the actress in one of her interviews, is that Shaw is made to be a male season-1 Sarah who has an emotional connection with her (both are superman-y, ridiculous good looking, seasoned spies who lost a loved one the spy life). They understand each other. Shaw is also made to be Chuck-like (hates guns but knows how to use them).
The way I see it, Shaw knows Sarah is in love with Chuck, thinks it’s a mistake, just like his mistake with Eve, and tries to bring her back to a safe loveless spy relationship in accordance with the cardinal rule (spies don’t fall in love). That’s the meaning of his proposal at the end of Mask. He rubs Sarah’s shoulders, Sarah warns him about the danger of a relationship (“You know how dangerous this is”) and he replies he’s the safest guy in the world because there won’t be any feelings between them, and he won’t fall in love with her. He’s proposing a spy partnership with sexual benefits where the mission always comes first, as he demonstrates both in 3.09 (willing to sacrifice Chuck for the mission) and in 3.12 (willing to sacrifice himself for the mission).
Sarah (obviously) says no to Shaw’s proposal at the beginning of 3.08 Fake Name and only accepts when she thinks she can find real in it (hence, the real name reveal). The way I see it, this is a reversal of the first two seasons, when Chuck loved Sarah but tried to have a real relationship with Lou and Jill since he couldn’t have one with Sarah.
Shaw is a male season-1 Sarah just as Hannah is a female season-1 Chuck. The two relationships are there to show Chuck and Sarah that they can’t go back. They have changed each other two much to go back to their “ideal” partners from two years before. Shaw and Hannah are no longer enough.
That’s the way I understand the season-3 relationships.
That’s pretty much how i see it too.
The way i see Cole, and Sarah not giving into temptation, is that Chuck is still available (so to speak) in Sarah’s mind, where as in when she gives into Shaw, is because Chuck’s not available.
Instead of an emotional connection between Sarah and Shaw, i think they’re just using each other to numb their pain with a physical relationship. Because when Sarah tells Chuck that spies don’t fall in love, by definition it means no feelings or emotions. And just like you said, as i did in my post, Shaw tells Sarah he’s the safest guy in the world because there will be no feelings attached.
If only she seen the psycho look on his face when he said that.
The only thing that makes me feel better about s3 is knowing how Sarah really feels about Chuck, and that Shaw knows it too. It’s written all over her face with every interaction she has with him. Shaw means absolutely nothing to her in that way. When Casey tells her the truth, she doesn’t give Shaw a single thought. She rushes to be with Chuck.
The way I understand it, Shaw and Sarah approach their relationship differently.
Shaw only wants a loveless partnership with benefits because he loved and lost and learned the wrong lesson from it (love is a mistake).
Sarah, on the other hand, says no to that arrangement (beginning of 3.08) and only accepts Shaw when he calls her by her real name, meaning she hopes for a real relationship (same as Chuck with Lou and Jill).
Also, she brings Shaw Chuck-related stuff (a crockpot from the Buy More and food from her date with Chuck in 2.01), a symbolic representation that she tries to see Shaw as her Chuck.
She is then made to work with Shaw in 3.09 and with Chuck in 3.10 and sees they are “different,” as she confesses to Chuck in 3.11.
I think all the relationships in Chuck have a purpose. In S3, the purpose of Hannah and Shaw is to show Chuck and Sarah that even the ideal partners from S1 are no longer enough. They have changed each other too much and cannot go back.
Even Yvonne said in interviews that Sarah tries to find something with Shaw but can’t. It’s like Anna with Morgan and Jason in season 2
We should also consider that season-3 Sarah does not consider feelings as a liability. In her conversation with Chuck by the fountain the morning after Carina disposes of Karl, Chuck tells Sarah he is not a real spy because he’s emotional, and that makes him a liability. Sarah replies, “Not always… If it wasn’t for your emotions, Carina would be dead.” Sarah and Chuck swap roles in season 3; he tries to bury his feelings, while she embraces them. It’s all part of the plan to bring them together in 3.13 and 3.14 as spies with feelings.
When i said that Sarah and Shaw were using each other to numb their pain, as soon as i posted that, i thought, you idiot!….Sarah’s the one using Shaw to numb her pain and Shaw just wants to sleep with her. I tried to edit it, but it was 4 hours later and it must’ve been too late.
A crockpot from the Buy More and food from their stakeout as a sympolic representation of trying to see Shaw as her Chuck is a good spot. I never thought of that before.
I remember an interview like that from Yvonne. In it she says “Whatever Chuck and Sarah are looking for in other people, they’ll never find it, because it’s right there in front of them”.
In the last paragraph of my previous post, it was all about how it’s written all over Sarah’s face how she feels. I should’ve included Chuck in that too. In the dinner date with Hannah, in her speech she talks about being exactly where you’re supposed to be. Then we see Chuck, and he realizes it’s not where he wants to be.
The way I see it, this show is built on counterpoint. Chuck loved Sarah unreservedly in S1 and S2, but couldn’t be with her, so he tried to have a real relationship with Lou and Jill. We know this because he uses those words in both situations. He actually tells Sarah so.
Now, in season 3, we have the counterpoint—Sarah loves Chuck unreservedly and wants a real relationship (she tells him so in Prague) while he must learn to balance love and duty. Sarah can’t be with him because his feelings for her are a liability (Chuck’s own words to her at the end of 3.02, “You’re right. I’m not a real spy. I’m emotional, and this makes me a liability.”), so, with Chuck unavailable to her, even though she loves him, she tries to have a real relationship with Shaw. How do we know? Because she says she wants to find her real self, Sam. And when Shaw calls her Sam (her real name), she starts a relationship with him, hoping to find real with a person she tries to see as Chuck (hence, the Chuck-related gifts at the end of 3.08 Fake Name). From then on, it’s a comparison game in hen head and heart between Shaw and Chuck, in a reference to her conversation with Anna in S2 about Jason and Morgan. That is why the creators make her work with Shaw in 3.09 and with Chuck in 3.10, so that she can see the difference between the two.
The show is all about building a real relationship between Chuck and Sarah, and the purpose of season 3 is to show them that they will never find real with anyone else but each other. That’s why they are put together with their “on paper” ideal partners from S1 (a perfect Chuckette in Hannah [Lana] and a superman-y spy in Shaw [Sarah’s original last name was Kent, later changed to Walker]), and, as you noted, it’s different. It’s not where Chuck and Sarah are supposed to be with these other people, even though these are other people are mirrors of Charah’s past selves. They are no longer enough.
As Yvonne put in her interview with Mo Ryan, Sarah “tried to find something else with Shaw, but it’s just not the same. They [Chuck and Sarah] both realized that whatever they were trying to look for in other people, they’re never going to find it because it’s right there in front of them.”
As the show puts it, prophetically in Devon’s words at the end of 3.03 Chuck Versus the Angel de la Muerte, “If having a double life means giving up half of your real life, that’s just not how I want to live.” This line is what introduces Shaw and Hannah, who will be half of Sarah’s and Chuck’s life respectively. Shaw is the spy half of Sarah’s double life while Hannah is the real half of Chuck’s double life. And their relationships will prove Devon’s prophecy right—it’s just not how Chuck and Sarah want to live. That’s why they joyfully and giddily discover at the end of 3.14 Honeymooners that they can “have it all” (in Chuck’s words)—both duty and love, both the spy life and a real life, a full double life.
It’s a long arc prophetically introduced in Angel de la Muerte (Ellie to Sarah at the gala, “You go through hot and cold patches, you have to put the passion on hold [while Chuck becomes a spy]”) and Devon with the double-life line above. And the arc closes at the end of Honeymooners when Chuck and Sarah discover they can have their full double life together.
That’s why I think Sarah’s relationship with Shaw is more than just a rebound to numb her pain. I think it’s the reversal of Lou/Jill for Chuck. It’s her attempt to find real with someone else and realize she can’t. Only Chuck can giver both spy+real, a full double life.